Let us help YOU get to the inbox like we've helped these others!
One of the many things that we explain to people in our Email Deliverability Handbook is that while you must comply with the CAN-SPAM Act, you shouldn’t say that you comply with the CAN-SPAM Act. This advice may seem counter-intuitive, however here’s why.
First, while some spam filters and spam filtering are focussing less on content these days, many do still take note of content; Spam Assassin for example, which is one of the widely deployed open-source spam filters in the world. And those spam filters may actually consider you saying in your mailings that you comply with CAN-SPAM to be a sign that your email is more likely than not to be spam. Here’s one of the primary reasons for that: Because while complying with CAN-SPAM is necessary, it is by no means sufficient, to following best email practices.
As CAN-SPAM doesn’t actually prohibit spamming, so long as you are doing it within the parameters of CAN-SPAM, saying that you comply with the CAN-SPAM Act is like saying “I don’t batter people, but I stand in front of them on the sidewalk and yell obscenities at them.” Put another way, when you talk about being CAN-SPAM compliant, that signals those who are watching that you probably are doing things that are not prohibited by CAN-SPAM but that are still considered spamming. Such as adding people to your mailing list without asking them first, let alone getting their consent.
Why Complying with the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 Isn’t Enough
Conscientious mailers go far and above the requirements of CAN-SPAM. Oh, they are CAN-SPAM compliant, but they recognize that complying with CAN-SPAM is the bare minimum, and who wants to brag about doing the bare minimum? So they also are doing far more than just complying with CAN-SPAM in terms of their email sending practices. And it’s no coincidence that their email gets a much higher deliverability rate than the email of the mailers who only comply with CAN-SPAM, and do no more. In fact the ‘only CAN-SPAM compliers’ are often sending email that most of the world considers to be spam and even illegal (everybody knows that in the U.S. good ole CAN-SPAM allows email that the rest of the world has already made illegal).
And those email senders who are doing more than just complying with CAN-SPAM have far better delivery to the inbox, and correspondingly less email going to the spam folder.
Finally, not only may saying in your email that you are CAN-SPAM compliant help get you shunted to the junk folder, but it really is like wearing a name tag that says “Hi, my name is The Best Thing I Can Say About My Email is That it Complies with the Law that Doesn’t Prohibit from Spamming.”
So be a complier and comply with the CAN-SPAM Act, but don’t just comply with it, be a best practicer too.
No responses yet